ISSN :2582-9793

Application of Machine Learning in orthodontics: A bibliometric analysis

Original Research (Published On: 15-Mar-2024 )
Application of Machine Learning in orthodontics: A bibliometric analysis
DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.54364/AAIML.2024.41115

Sherif Elsaraj

Adv. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn., 4 (2):2014-2026

Sherif Elsaraj : McGill University,Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences Jewish General Hospital Department of Dentistry

Download PDF Here

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.54364/AAIML.2024.41115

Article History: Received on: 06-Feb-24, Accepted on: 08-Mar-24, Published on: 15-Mar-24

Corresponding Author: Sherif Elsaraj

Email: sherif.elsaraj@mcgill.ca

Citation: Mahmood Dashti, Niusha Zare, Neda Tajbakhsh, James Nobel, Sara Hashemi, Shohreh Ghasemi, Seyed Saman Hashemi, Sherif Elsaraj (2024). Application of Machine Learning in orthodontics: A bibliometric analysis. Adv. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn., 4 (2 ):2014-2026

          

Abstract

    

Background: Machine learning (ML), a facet of artificial intelligence, utilizes algorithms to learn from data without explicit programming. In orthodontics, ML offers advantages like tailoring personalized treatment plans for patients. Despite its potential, there hasn't been a bibliometric analysis of ML studies in orthodontics. This study aims to fill that gap.

Types of studies reviewed: Articles on ML in orthodontics were reviewed from Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed. Data on journal details, country of origin, publication month, citations, keywords, and co-authorship were extracted.

Results: The search retrieved a total of 1478 articles, of which 701 were excluded. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics has published the most articles (3.6%), followed by the seminars in Orthodontics Journal (1.6%), and Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research Journal (1.6%). Most of the articles were from researchers from China (n = 156), the United States (n = 107), and South Korea (n = 70). The number of citations of the published articles ranged from 0 to 702, with most articles (75.54%) having at least one citation. Science Mapping analysis revealed that the most used keywords were Human(s) (n = 484), Artificial intelligence (n = 194), Female (n=169), Male (n = 161), and Cephalometry (n = 151).

Clinical implications: Clinicians should be aware of the emerging global collaborative landscape in machine learning trends, stay informed about technological advancements, and consider the potential impact of ML on patient care and treatment outcomes in their practices.

Statistics

   Article View: 493
   PDF Downloaded: 17